Excuse #30


    

     hen rationalizing the sin of dining out on the Sabbath, a prominent church leader claims that because Jesus healed the sick on this day, he (this leader) may now seek out unbelievers who profane the holy and pay them for their Sabbath labor. As you read his point it is important to understand that there is absolutely no prohibition in the scriptures (Old or New Testament) against healing on the Sabbath. However, there are multiple prohibitions against going out into spiritual Egypt and purchasing their goods, which is exactly what this pastor is advocating. He begins his point by citing the story of Jesus healing a woman on the Sabbath and how the Messiah explained the role of compassion on this day.

                                    

As we will begin to see, from God's point of view, working on the Sabbath is not the stopping of work altogether of oneself, nor of others, but to draw attention as to what the work is, and why one is doing it on that day. It makes all the difference in the world.

 

The Lord then answered him, and said, You hypocrite, does not each one of you on the Sabbath loose his ox or his ass from the stall, and lead him away to watering? Luke 13:15

                 

So the question is this: If God, under certain circumstances, shows that meeting animal needs is required, what about human needs on the Sabbath? You see, Jesus is making a comparison that ought to be obvious to any one of us. 

              

Blurring the Lines

                                  

     What this church leader is attempting to do is blur the lines between what Jesus did when healing those who suffered from a genuine physical affliction, one that was beyond their control, and what this minister wants to do because of the pleasure he derives from it.

 

     This is a huge deception and a mockery of the Messiah's compassion. In essence, this COG leader wants God's people to believe that going to a restaurant is the moral equivalent of taking care of a helpless animal, or, a helpless woman. In essence he is saying: "If Jesus would show compassion on the afflicted, he would most certainly show compassion on His people’s need for food on the Sabbath.” However, here is what he doesn’t tell you.

 

God Almighty and Sabbath Meals

 

     When God led the children of Israel out of Egypt He made provisions for their meals, Why? Because He did not want them to go hungry. However, He also gave them specific instructions regarding those meals and His Sabbath. He declared, in words that are crystal clear, that His people were to gather their Sabbath day food on the sixth day—not the seventh (Ex. 16: 4-6). Additionally, He commanded them to prepare their Sabbath meals on the sixth day as well (v. 23).

 

     We now come to the question of the day. What would happen if the Israelites decided to gather their food on the Sabbath, instead of the sixth day? Would God show compassion because of their "NEED" for nourishment? Would He provide an alternate food source? NO! We know this because that very thing took place just a short time after the exodus, and the Almighty's reaction was anything but conciliatory. Not only did He allow them to go hungry that day (Ex. 16:27), but He also issued a blistering indictment against them. Notice what He said.

 

How long refuse ye to keep my commandments and my laws? See, for that the Lord hath given you the Sabbath, therefore He giveth you the sixth day the bread of two days; abide ye every man in his place. Let no man go out of his place on the seventh day. (Ex. 16:28)

             

     Here, God is rebuking the children of Israel for their failure to honor His Sabbath. Specifically, He was condemning their lack of preparation. In essence, God was conveying to His people three critical elements concerning eating on the Sabbath. These elements were as follows.

 

1) Food was not to be acquired on the Sabbath

2) Food was not to be prepared on the Sabbath                 

3) His people were not to leave “their place” on the Sabbath.

 

     Regrettably, this minister claims that because God is compassionate, He now permits His people to do all three of those prohibitions. They may now seek out Sabbath-breakers and pay them for their labor. In essence the Sabbath-breaker has become his alternate food source.

 

     The fact of the matter is that God has already provided for the Sabbath food needs of His people today. And contrary to this minister, His remedy is not for them to seek out unbelievers and purchase the fruit of their sin.

            

More Excuses

                                  

      Despite the obvious Biblical prohibition against dining out on the Sabbath this man wants you to believe that this is what Jesus was teaching with another principle regarding helping a defenseless animal. Notice how he makes his point.

 

And he answered them, saying, Which of you shall have an ass or an ox fallen into a pit, and will not straightway pull him out on the Sabbath day? Luke 14:5

 

To extricate an ox from a cistern or a pit would cause a considerable amount of work when you think about how big those animals are, and that they would fall into a cistern.

 

Jesus is showing then that if that occurred, the life of the animal and probably the prosperity of the family is deemed more important than breaking the Sabbath through the hard labor of rescuing the animal from its agony and its fears.

            

Now for the Truth

           

      When Jesus gave this very important principle regarding the Sabbath, He was dining at the home of a prominent Pharisee. Also there was a man suffering from “dropsy,” an abnormal and painful accumulation of fluid in the tissue of the body. Some believe this man was placed in front of Jesus in an attempt to see if He would heal on the Sabbath. Others have suggested that Jesus Himself may have been responsible for the man being there.

             

    Regardless of how the man got there Jesus seized upon this moment to teach a valuable lesson about compassion. He began by asking these religious leaders if it was wrong to heal on the Sabbath. When they did not answer Him, Jesus healed the man. Perhaps anticipating their reaction, Jesus posed another question:

 

Which of you shall have an ass or an ox fallen into a pit, and will not straightway pull him out on the Sabbath day? (Lk. 14:5)

             

    Jesus’ question silenced these men because it not only appealed to their understanding of the scriptures, but also to rabbinical law which provided for such acts of mercy. By invoking the law, Jesus was cutting through all the potential arguments these men may have been crafting. However, His words and actions were saying much more. The point He was making was that sometimes life does not go according to plan. There can be unexpected twists and turns. In short: an ox can fall into a pit.

             

    The action Jesus took illustrated that when there is danger to life or property, God understands and even expects His children to take measures to correct the problem, even if it occurs on His Sabbath.  In other words, save the ox.

 

The Ox in a Ditch Today

             

    This principle can be applied to situations that occur in our modern life as well. For example: there may be a time when the car breaks down or an injury occurs. These are not planned events. No one made a reservation to have an accident. No one gathered some friends after services and planned out an emergency. It would be ridiculous to do so. However, there are times when a genuine unforeseen crisis does happen. The fact is that our lives can be interrupted by events that are simply beyond our control.   

            

    However, there is a principle here that must be respected. The ox in a ditch is the exception, not the rule. What this long time minister is suggesting is that the exception may now be the rule. In other words, God's people may now actually orchestrate the exception. For example, they may decide that it would be a nice change from their Sabbath routine to dine out in three weeks. Therefore, they may make reservations at a nice restaurant and look forward to their ox falling into a pit.

 

Legitimate Exceptions

             

    There are also times when purchasing something on the Sabbath might be appropriate based on the principle of an ox in a ditch. For example: suppose you are taking a Sabbath walk and notice an elderly gentleman has collapsed on the sidewalk. When you approach to offer assistance, he informs you that he is diabetic and asks if you could buy him a specific kind of candy bar. Across the street is a convenience store and in your pocket is a five dollar bill. This is an ox in a ditch. This act is not about engaging in business on the Sabbath. It is about doing good on the Sabbath. This being the case, there may be times when it might be necessary to buy food on this day. But this should only take place in a genuine emergency where the alternative may be catastrophic. To put this into perspective ask yourself, “How many times does an ox fall into a ditch?”

                           

    Finally, when Jesus gave the lesson of an ox in a ditch, it was in the context of healing, not dining. The principle is there to be sure, but it is not to be manipulated. To do so would be a HUGE mistake. Those who use Jesus’ teaching to justify going to restaurants on the Sabbath should ask themselves, “Is it really an emergency?” Or is it possible that you are just exploiting for your own benefit the compassion and mercy of the very Savior who made provisions for dealing with a real tragedy that may arise on God’s holy Sabbath?

  

      

 

Appendix

 

 

Return to Directory

 



RELATED LINKS


HONORING
GOD'S SABBATH